Maybe the majority doesn't care one way or the other - they will just go
wherever the meetings are held in which case:
let's make them easy to get to
cheap
decent food
one roof (with other hotels near-by)
cheap
and easy to get to
You could pick Rosemont, IL (next to O'hare) for every meeting (oops,
sorry - misses on decent food).
geoff
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 13:23 -0700, Dave CROCKER wrote:
>
> On 8/24/2011 1:18 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> > As long as a relatively large percentage of IETF folks see meetings as
> > an opportunity to sight-see, I don't think we'll see much support for
> > rotating among a small set of major hub locations.
>
> +1
>
> But it's worse than "relatively large percent". There's absolutely no
> minority
> constituency that is vocal about wanting this to change. That's why I
> declared
> myself giving up on this topic.
>
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
