On Aug 31, 2011, at 3:44 PM, Hector wrote: > I'm having a hard time understanding why you continue to work on the basis > that people "fail to read" essentially implying stupidity in the process.
I work on the basis of "fail to read" because I've seen countless examples of it. And stupidity is not the same thing as lack of diligence. > The Point being that if Tony's I-D has it as it was shown above, then it > would be incorrect too in its understanding of RFC2119 because non-normative > words are clearly concepts related to a non-required mandate. As far as I'm concerned, Tony's I-D is a nonstarter, and therefore irrelevant. Keith _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
