On 01/09/2011 17:07, Alexander Vainshtein wrote:
Yaakov,
You've written
PW that starts in an MPLS-TP domain, can easily leak into a non-TP
domain
This is exactly the point that I've raised in my IETF LC comment on
the draft (for MS-PW) - please see my email (to several lists) that
explains that in some detail, at
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3/current/msg12581.html.
Regards,
Sasha
The operator intends to improve traffic distribution in the IP/MPLS
domain, hence he enables insertionand discard of "flow labels" at the
two S-PEs.
Speaking as an author of the FAT-PW draft I do not recall any text that
proposes that S-PEs insert FLs in the stack, and it never occurred to me
that anyone anyone would try, since would require a change to the design
of the S-PEs.
Stewart
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf