[BA] My comment is that having guidelines for this could help make the advancement process more predictable. Thank you for working on this. Jari Arkko said: During the discussion of the two maturity levels change, a question was brought up about DISCUSSes appropriate for documents that advance on the standards track. We discussed this in the IESG and I drafted some suggested guidelines. Feedback on these suggestions would be welcome. The intent is to publish an IESG statement to complement the already existing general-purpose DISCUSS criteria IESG statement (http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html). Here are the suggested guidelines for documents that advance to IS: http://www.arkko.com/ietf/iesg/discuss-criteria-advancing.txt Comments appreciated. Please send comments either on this list or to the IESG (i...@ietf.org) in time before our next telechat (Thursday, September 8, 2011).
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
