On Sep 12, 2011, at 2:31 PM, Joe Touch wrote: > The issue is that if this document wants to go outside the spec, *it* needs > to update RFC2782 - and survive the discussion that will incur.
Well, in a pedantic sense I'm sure that's true. But it doesn't need to update RFC2782 as it pertains to anything but the ability to locate a certain subset of NFS-based services. It certainly doesn't have to change how SRV works with respect to other protocols. Keith
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
