On Sep 13, 2011, at 11:25 AM, Joe Touch wrote: > On Sep 12, 2011, at 8:09 PM, Keith Moore <[email protected]> wrote: > ... >>> SRV indicates the port number (useful if not the default) and weight, etc. >> >> right. but given that you can include the same things in a TXT record, if >> you have to query for TXT RRs anyway, what's the value added by doing an >> additional query for SRV RRs? > ... >> I'd be very happy to see SRV records deprecated, or at least discouraged, >> for new protocols. > ... >> But I don't think the Internet is desperate enough to want to fix DNS yet. > > I conclude from this sequence that you would prefer to reinvent the DNS > inside TXT records (which is possible, but fruitless), and that others do > this on your behalf. > > This is outside the focus of this thread.
Again, Joe, you're really bad at trying to discern my motives. I suggest you reread what I've written and take it at face value. Keith
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
