On 9/14/11 11:10 AM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote: > A fine document. I support its publication. > > Of course, you should have changed all references to vCard 4 to vCard 5,
There is no vCard5. The version in RFC 6350 is vCard4. > and reference to VCARDDAV WG draft to RFC 6350. Naturally. That will be automatically updated by the RFC Editor anyway, but it doesn't hurt to fix it before then. > Also: > >> Syntax specifications shown here use the augmented Backus-Naur Form >> (ABNF) as described in [RFC5234], and are specified as in the base >> vcard specification [I-D.ietf-vcarddav-vcardrev]. > > I think the following should be enough: > >> Syntax specifications shown here use the Augmented Backus-Naur Form >> (ABNF) as described in [RFC5234]. I'll leave that up to the authors. > Mykyta Yevstifeyev > > 14.09.2011 18:44, The IESG wrote: >> The IESG has received a request from the vCard and CardDAV WG (vcarddav) >> to consider the following document: >> - 'vCard Format Extensions : place of birth, place and date of death' >> <draft-ietf-vcarddav-birth-death-extensions-00.txt> as a Proposed >> Standard > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
