> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John > Levine > Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 1:19 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-jdfalk-maawg-cfblbcp-02.txt> (Complaint > Feedback Loop Operational Recommendations) to Informational RFC > > >The "no derivative" clause makes it impossible to incorporate the > >material in this draft in any IETF work. > > Section 3.3 of RFC 5378, on derivative works says: > > There are two exceptions to this requirement: documents > describing proprietary technologies and documents that are > republications of the work of other standards organizations. > > It looks to me like the latter clause applies here. RFC 5744 has > similar language specifically for the Independent stream.
Concur. I'm in support of publication, as well as the "enough with the nitpicking already" sentiment. -MSK _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
