Sounds like I made an error... On Oct 27, 2011, at 8:42 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On Oct 27, 2011, at 7:01 AM, Fred Baker wrote: > >> I think you're saying that there shouldn't be; at this instant, there >> actually is such a requirement. > > Either you are incorrect, or the new MILE WG was chartered incorrectly. I'm > hoping it is the former. > >> What there isn't a requirement for is a Bar BOF (and I would argue that >> there *is* a requirement that if a Bar BOF be held, it be held in a bar :-) > > The MILE BarBoF in Quebec was certainly not in a bar. Further, the organizers > went out of their way to encourage remote participation, and there was a > presentation by phone of someone who had some interesting use scenarios that > were put into the eventual charter. (Funny how this ties to the message that > started this thread bak two or three levels of indirection.) > > --Paul Hoffman > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
