Scott, Well, it's moot now because I've withdrawn the request.
However, according to the IESG statement dated 10/20/11 titled "Revised IESG Statement on Designating RFCs as Historic", RFC justifications are no longer required for this action. If you have an argument against this new policy, you should respond to the IESG's statement. Cheers, Andy On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Bradner, Scott <[email protected]> wrote: > where is the written justification? > > recording a reason will help people in the future understand why this was > done > > I object to a reclassification without a RFC saying why > > Scott > > On Oct 27, 2011, at 4:16 PM, IESG Secretary wrote: > > The IESG has received a request from an individual to reclassify RFC 979 > > (PSN End-to-End functional specification) to HISTORIC. The current status > > of this document is UNKNOWN. > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > > [email protected] mailing lists by 2011-11-24. Exceptionally, comments may > > be sent to [email protected] instead. In either case, please retain the > > beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > _______________________________________________ > > IETF-Announce mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
