Hi Noel, > -----Original Message----- > From: Noel Chiappa [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 8:28 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: RE: LISP is not a Loc-ID Separation protocol > > > From: "Templin, Fred L" <[email protected]> > > > It just circles back again to the fact that what LISP > calls "EID" is > > something that names an interface; not an end system. > > And I keep pointing out that an LEID which is assigned to a > virtual interface, > one which is created _solely_ as a place to hold the system's > identity, walks > like a EID duck, quacks like a EID duck, etc, etc. > > I mean, here we have a name which i) is purely identity, ii) > has no location > info of any kind in it, iii) cannot be used for forwarding > anywhere, etc, etc. > > Where in that list is any difference from a 'real' EID (in > the sense of 'name > for an end system')? > > > (For those on this list who missed the previous N repetitions of this > debate, you can now see why there have been N+1 of them.)
That you have chosen to re-enter the loop again does not prove your point. My point is proven by the analogy I gave in the previous iteration: https://www.ietf.org/ibin/c5i?mid=6&rid=49&gid=0&k1=933&k2=60357&tid=1320334244 Thanks - Fred [email protected] > Noel _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
