+1 I also wonder how the ADs manage to read the documents for their own WGs when the agendas are this late. It's a lot of reading.
On Nov 7, 2011, at 11:24 PM, SM wrote: > Hello, > > "Since it is important that working group members have adequate time to > review all documents", it would be good if relevant WG documents are made > available at least two weeks before the start of the WG session. Could the > IESG "please do something" so that participants have adequate time to review > such documents? > > The following WGs have not published any agenda yet: > > 1. RADEXT > 2. SOFTWIRE > 3. OPSEC > 4. CUSS cuss - got canceled .... > 5. FORCES > 6. TSVWG > 7. OPSAWG > 8. IDR > 9. PPSP > 10. PKIX > 11. REPUTE (new WG) > 12. MBONED > 13. CONEX > 14. TICTOC > 15. ANCP > 16. GROW > 17. LISP > 18. MULTRANS (BoF) > 19. KRB-WG > > Will the above sessions, excluding exceptional cases, be cancelled? > > Regards, > -sm > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
