On Nov 28, 2011, at 1:25 PM, Ronald Bonica wrote: > On October 10, 2011, the IESG issued a last call for comments regarding > draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-09 (IANA Reserved IPv4 Prefix for > Shared CGN Space). While the community did not display consensus supporting > the draft, it also did not display consensus against the draft. Therefore, I > will submit the draft to the full IESG for its consideration at its December > 1 teleconference. The draft will be published as a BCP if a sufficient number > of IESG members ballot "Yes" or "No Objection", and if no IESG member ballots > "Discuss".
Regardless of whether or not IESG members support the allocation in this document, it is *not* a BCP. There is no current practice in this area; if there was, any of the /10s being used could be used. RFC 5735 is a BCP because the addressed listed were already known to be used for the purposes described; draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request is, as its title says, a request for a new allocation. If the IESG decides to publish this document, please be forthright and call it a Proposed Standard. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
