On Nov 29, 2011 9:46 PM, "Mark Andrews" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > In message <m2r50q42nn.wl%[email protected]>, Randy Bush writes: > > > skype etc. will learn. This does prevent the breakage it just makes > > > it more controlled. What's the bet Skype has a patched released > > > within a week of this being made available? > > > > cool. then, by that logic, let's use 240/4. the apps will patch within > > a week. ok, maybe two. > > 240/4 is not treated as unicast / routable by many OS. >
Necessity is the mother of invention. There was already an assumption that patches will be made for draft-weil, 240/4 will cut deeper for sure. Truth told, I only started ipv6 pushing after my 240/4 efforts proved fruitless with the ietf and my vendors. I hope the networks supporting draft-weil can turn that same corner. Cb > > i will spare you cites to the measurements of patch installation, or > > lack thereof. > > Skype, by default, will tell you when there is a patch available. > Also if you don't patch you are not in a worse position than you > will be when your ISP starts to hand you ambigious addresses that > are not identified as such. > > What we do in is a way for the customers to request non-ambigious > addresses in response to DHCP/PPP etc. requests along side this > allocation and for the return address to be properly annotated. > > -- > Mark Andrews, ISC > 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia > PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
