> -----Original Message----- > From: Dave CROCKER [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 11:16 PM > To: Murray S. Kucherawy > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-kucherawy-dkim-atps-11.txt> (DKIM Authorized > Third-Party Signers) to Experimental RFC > > > I'd be fine with that, so long as experimental-status drafts are > > allowed to make IANA registrations. (I thought they weren't, which is > > why it is the way it is right now.) > > depends on the criteria for the registry.
So it does, and the registry for DKIM signature tags is "IETF Consensus", which doesn't require standards track documents to update. So I guess the registrations could indeed be made here. Neat. It's a short walk from the current wording to actually requesting the IANA action. I'll check with my shepherd and sponsoring AD for advice prior to the end of LC. Thanks, -MSK _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
