> From: "George, Wes" <[email protected]>
> <sarcasm> thanks for that wonderfully relevant and technical rebuttal.
Err, Ron asked us to stay off this (non-productive) point:
> From: Ronald Bonica <[email protected]>
> Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 17:06:42 -0500
> By contrast, further discussion of the following topics would not help
> the IESG gauge consensus:
> - Does the assignment of the requested /10 enable or hinder the
deployment of IPv6?
> - Is CGN a viable service model for IPv4?
So far I've been trying to be a good boy, and keep quiet about IPv6, so I
hope everyone else can also comply with his request.
Noel
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
