> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John > R. Levine > Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 5:25 PM > To: Dave Crocker > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-kucherawy-dkim-atps-11.txt> (DKIM Authorized > Third-Party Signers) to Experimental RFC > > If you're referring to the second paragraph in section 5, I agree that > the second sentence should go, or at least be rewritten to clarify that > the client is supposed to pretend that the message passed ADSP. If > it's anything else in atps-11, you'll have to help me out with > references to specific language.
But that's what Section 6 says. Section 5 is for those people that do DKIM without ADSP but care about giving author domain signatures preferential treatment. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
