Pete Resnick wrote:
>>> and can be used by other
>>> people who build sane equipment that understands "shared" addresses can
>>> appear on two different interfaces.
>> With so complicated functionality of NAT today, the only
>> practical approach to build such equipment is to make it
>> a double NAT
>
> Correct.
Note that the double NAT, here, is AN equipment.
>> Can IETF allocate such address?
>
> That's what this document is doing: Allocating address space to go
> between 2 NATs.
>
> Maybe I don't understand your question?
My point is that those who are arguing against the proposed
allocation because of the capability of a double NAT
equipment should argue for allocation of another space
to enable development of the double NAT equipment.
Masataka Ohta
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
