Steven Bellovin wrote: > Scott, if memory serves you and I wanted the high-order 2 bits of the IPng > address to select between 64, 128, 192, and 256-bit addresses -- and when > we couldn't get that we got folks to agree on 128-bit addresses instead of > 64-bit, which is what had been on the table.
Thus, IPv6 was mortally wounded from the beginning.
Masataka Ohta
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
