Mustapha, You might want to wait for any other LC comments before updating.
Thanks, Andy On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha) < [email protected]> wrote: > Ooops. Thank you for pointing this out Stewart. I will make the update and > publish a new revision. > > Mustapha. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 12:48 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit-06.txt> > (Pseudowire Preferential Forwarding Status Bit) to Proposed Standard > > > Authors > > There was on point that I notice that you did not address from the AD > review and so I am picking it up as a LC comment: > > In section 10 you say: > > "This document makes the following update to the PwOperStatusTC > textual convention in RFC5542 [8]: " > > This update should be recorded in the metadata (top left front page) and > it is usual to put a one line note in the abstract. > > Stewart > > > > On 07/03/2012 17:00, The IESG wrote: > > The IESG has received a request from the Pseudowire Emulation Edge to > > Edge WG (pwe3) to consider the following document: > > - 'Pseudowire Preferential Forwarding Status Bit' > > <draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit-06.txt> as a Proposed Standard > > > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > > [email protected] mailing lists by 2012-03-21. Exceptionally, comments may > > be sent to [email protected] instead. In either case, please retain the > > beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > > > Abstract > > > > > > This document describes a mechanism for standby status signaling of > > redundant pseudowires (PWs) between their termination points. A set > > of redundant PWs is configured between provider edge (PE) nodes in > > single-segment pseudowire (SS-PW) applications, or between > > terminating provider edge (T-PE) nodes in multi-segment pseudowire > > (MS-PW) applications. > > > > In order for the PE/T-PE nodes to indicate the preferred PW to use > > for forwarding PW packets to one another, a new status bit is needed > > to indicate a preferential forwarding status of Active or Standby for > > each PW in a redundant set. > > > > In addition, a second status bit is defined to allow peer PE nodes to > > coordinate a switchover operation of the PW. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The file can be obtained via > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit/ > > > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit/ballot/ > > > > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > IETF-Announce mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce > > > > > -- > For corporate legal information go to: > > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html > > > _______________________________________________ > pwe3 mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3 >
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
