On Mar 15, 2012, at 6:47 AM, John C Klensin wrote: > > > --On Thursday, March 15, 2012 00:00 -0400 Ross Callon > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I don't like this proposal for two reasons: I frequently read >> email while not connected; When connected, bandwidths have >> gotten high enough that attachments on the most part are not >> slowing things down in an uncomfortable way. >> >> It might be okay for really large attachments, as long as only >> a few messages are affected. > > Borrowing a bit from Randy, the solution to really large > attachments is to ban them.
+1 Lixia
