On 2012-04-19 23:27, Ronald Bonica wrote:
...
> I think that this is a case-by-case judgment call. In some cases (e.g., RFC
> 1475), the experiment is clearly over. IMO, allowing RFC 1475 to retain
> EXPERIMENTAL status detracts from the credibility of current experiments that
> share the label.
I agree that it is case by case, so I don't really see the value in the
IESG statement. If it's appropriate to write an experiment-terminating
RFC, do so; if it's inappropriate, don't bother. That doesn't need
any new legislation.
Brian
