Hi Tobias. I would like to make them available as part of the proceedings so that anyone can find them and view them. This _may_ reduce subpoenas for the blue sheets in the future.
Many people have expressed similar thoughts about the RFID experiment. Last time we investigated a system for IETF meetings, it was quite expensive. I'll ask again to see if this has changed. Russ On Apr 22, 2012, at 11:44 PM, Tobias Gondrom wrote: > Hi Russ, > > from a privacy perspective: may I ask for what purpose you propose to publish > the blue sheets (with the names of all WG session attendees) with the > proceedings? > AFAIK, at the moment the blue sheets are basically available on request > especially in case of IP questions. What would lead to the proposal to > publish the list of names of attendees always with the proceedings? > > Best regards, Tobias > > > Ps.: btw. though I might be the only one, but I liked the blue sheet > replacement experiment (RFID) in Hiroshima... > > > > On 22/04/12 22:31, IETF Chair wrote: >> At IETF 83, we had a discussion about the future of blue sheets, many spoke >> at the mic in support of the proposal. There has been very little >> discussion on the mail list. However, all of the discussion that I have see >> has been very supportive. >> >> The suggestion is three blue sheet changes: >> 1. No longer ask for email address; >> 2. Scan the blue sheet and include the image in the proceedings for the WG >> session; and >> 3. Discard paper blue sheets after scanning. >> >> Please speak up if you think this is the wrong thing to do. >> >> Thanks, >> Russ >
