On Apr 30, 2012, at 12:25 PM, Stewart Bryant wrote: > Hi Ben > > Thank you for your review. > > The IANA policy is stated as IETF Review (end of first para in IANA)
Okay, I guess I just missed it. > > The normative text is deliberate - this was part of the change that we needed > to make. > Then as a reviewer, I think the proposed text is a bit confusing, as a paragraph describing how one element operates seems to make a normative requirement on the behavior of a different element. It would be better to make that assertion in the description of behavior for that other element. This is not a big deal, and certainly not a show stopper if people are attached to the current approach. It's just a personal opinion. (Sorry, I'd offer more specifics, but am not in a position to pull up the text at the moment, so I'm responding from memory. I will look again when I get the chance.) Thanks! Ben.
