> (1) When a document specifies "Expert Review" for a registry, it > should be required to spell out the criteria the Expert is supposed to > use, at least to the degree that isn't obvious. If it doesn't, that > should be grounds for "DISCUSS until fixed".
given our reknown abilities to predict and understand the future, this is going to work out really well. </dripping sarcasm> of course, any known non-obvious gotchas are worth passing along. but if they are non-obvious to the expert, then i suspect they will also have been non-obvious to the doc author(s). there may be a reason we have not automated this. randy
