>> Then that still permits the case of third_party for administration >> motivating the text in 13.1. > > Makes sense to me.
+1 > How about adding a sentence like... > > "CGN as described in this document does not provide any security > benefits over either single-user NAT or no NAT at all." I agree with Simon (also as one of the authors of this draft). We think that CGN is not the machine to proveide security benefits and the original intension of this draft is just to make CGN as neutral as possible... Best wishes, Shin Miyakawa
