Yes, Scott, that is correct, sorry for my poor phrasing. Brian
On 30/07/2012 17:33, Scott O Bradner wrote: > 2804 does not say not to talk about such things - or that such documents > should > not be published as RFCs - 2804 says that the IETF will not do standards work > in this area > > Scott > > On Jul 30, 2012, at 5:04 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > >> Under the long-standing IETF policy defined in RFC 2804, I trust >> we will not be discussing this draft, or >> draft-balaji-l2vpn-lawful-intercept-thru-label-dis, in the IETF. >> >> Regards >> Brian Carpenter >> >> On 30/07/2012 09:26, [email protected] wrote: >>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >>> directories. >>> >>> >>> Title : Label-based Provider-Provisioned Lawful Intercept for >>> L3 VPNs >>> Author(s) : Shankar Raman >>> Balaji Venkat Venkataswami >>> Gaurav Raina >>> Vasan Srini >>> Bhargav Bhikkaji >>> Filename : >>> draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercept-thru-label-dis-00.txt >>> Pages : 12 >>> Date : 2012-07-30 >>> >>> Abstract: >>> In models of Single-AS and inter-provider Multi- Protocol Label >>> Switching (MPLS) based Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) Lawful >>> Intercept is a key requirement. For example, MPLS-based Layer 3 VPN >>> models like VPLS and the like do not have any provider provisioned >>> methods of lawful intercept that are comprehensive, quick and easy to >>> provision from one single point. More particularly the auto- >>> provisioning of lawful intercept for all sets of streams travelling >>> between VPN sites and consequent re-direction of these streams to the >>> appropriate government network has not been covered without multiple >>> instances of having to configure the intercept at various points in >>> the network both in the Single-AS case and the Inter-Provider VPN >>> case. >>> >>> this paper, we propose a technique which uses a set of pre-defined >>> labels called Lawful Intercept labels and a method for provisioning >>> lawful intercept amongst the various PE devices using these labels >>> both in the Single-AS and the inter-provider VPN cases. A single >>> point of configuration is the key to this idea. The intercepted >>> traffic is mirrored on a PE or a whole set of PEs or on all the PEs >>> participating in the VPN. A technique called the Domino-effect >>> provisioning of these Label-based Provider Provisioned Lawful >>> Intercept mechanism is also outlined. >>> >>> >>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercept-thru-label-dis >>> >>> There's also a htmlized version available at: >>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercept-thru-label-dis-00 >>> >>> >>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> I-D-Announce mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce >>> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html >>> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt >>> > >
