John, Could you suggest a solution to this issue or an additional statements to the document, I think then the document may need amendment, to consider your advise/experience.
AB On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:46 PM, John E Drake <[email protected]> wrote: > AB,**** > > ** ** > > I don’t think the principles articulated in this document will come as a > surprise to any SDO with which the IETF interacts and I don’t think this > document will prevent another SDO from acting badly wrt the IETF if it so > chooses. Also, bear in mind that ‘acting badly’ is entirely subjective.** > ** > > ** ** > > For example, if you were to ask the ITU leadership if they ‘acted badly’ > during the MPLS-TP imbroglio, I think they would counter that it was the > IETF that ‘acted badly’. In fact, I have seen them say exactly this.**** > > ** ** > > And lest we forget, we had a much more comprehensive agreement in place > for MPLS-TP.**** > > ** ** > > Thanks,**** > > ** ** > > John**** > > ** ** > > Sent from my iPhone**** > > ** ** > > *From:* Abdussalam Baryun [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 15, 2012 6:29 AM > *To:* John E Drake > *Cc:* ietf > *Subject:* Re: FW: Affirmation of the Modern Global Standards Paradigm**** > > ** ** > > Hi John,**** > > **** > > >Does this document actually have a purpose, and if so, what is it? > > IMO the document introduces important statements (purpose and objectives) > so that other organisations and SDOs recognise while interacting with IETF. > It may look simple or known, but necessary for IETF future cooperations.** > ** > > **** > > I agree that your question is very important and that the best person to > answer is the Chair of IETF or IAB. **** > > **** > > AB**** >
