On 9/6/12, NomCom Chair <nomcom-ch...@ietf.org> wrote: > > However, we also need the community's views and input on the jobs > within each organization. If you have ideas on job responsibilities > (more, less, different), please let us know. Please send suggestions > and feedback to nomco...@ietf.org. Suggestion to assist; 1) the DA responsibility of "The DA is to select the WG chair" and 2) to assist the method of NomCom collection of feedback information from community. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- My suggestion is to add a report/questionnare for comments on WGs performance, as just to collect comment/feedback on WG progress from only the community. Usually community feedback on WGs' progresses are very important for the IETF, which a lack of progress maybe due to chair or DA position, which I think is the most important issue in all nominations vote decision. The feedback can be named the community-WG-progress-report or ietf-participants-feedback-report, which has many advantages.
In abstract the advantages are; firstly, the community-WG-progress-report will be attached to an optional DA-report that will be given to the new DA. The new DA will be able to decide how to select/advise/follow-up-with the WGs chairs for the next year. Secondly, the community-wg-progress-report will help NomCom12 to vote on the nominated positions, if previous chairs or DAs are going for a position as IESG or other. I am not sure if we already have this community feedback about WG progress. IMO, no IETF member can vote efficiently without information or feedback from internet-community. Best Regards AB > > Thank you for your help in identifying qualified nominees, and in providing > > feedback about individuals we are considering for IETF leadership > positions. > > Matt Lepinski > nomcom-ch...@ietf.org > >
