On 9/13/2012 12:28 PM, Martin Rex wrote:
Joe,
So it's not a slam dunk that you have the rights you think for every
I-D; you definitely don't have those rights for IDs
We're NOT talking about rights that were transfered from the document
author to arbitrary third parties here, but about rights that were
given to the IETF ("IETF contribution"), and which have never been
time-limited.
The "expires" term and corresponding entire text of the ID submissions
guidelines suggest otherwise.
So archival and making accessible I-D contributions past the "expiration"
of an I-D is perfectly legal for the IETF, unless the I-D contains an
explicit copyright notice to the contrary (most I-Ds from 199x do not
seem to carry any copyright notice at all).
I've already pointed out text that, e.g., someone might use to make the
case to the contrary.
Finally, in the US, lawyer isn't who would decide this; a jury would.
Where you are _correct_ is, copy&pasting parts of such an old I-D
or the whole document into new documents will in fact require contacting
the original author(s)/copyright holder(s) and obtain permission,
the Note Well provisions likely will not be sufficient, at least for those
old I-Ds. (it is not just a matter of courtesy, but a requirement).
I assume the latter is what rfc5378 is supposed to fix.
There are several variants of issues that apply, at least three I recall:
pre 1994
1994-2008
2008-now
This isn't the first time this issue has been discussed on this list.
RFC 5378 is intended to address reuse of material, as you suggest - not
whether that material can be publicly posted.
Joe
