On Oct 15, 2012, at 5:53 PM, Adrian Farrel <[email protected]> wrote:
>> ok, i am lost. the draft is only an outline and has zero content? is
>> it a quiz?
>
> Treat it like that and see if you can give Joel the right answers.
>
> For me: Did it make any difference to you that it was a LIM rather than
> simply a
> SIDR interim?
Yes -- because it was LIM multiple WGs met at the same time. This meant that
OpSec and V6Ops conflicted with SIDR, and so I missed the SIDR meeting.
> Were logistics and resources worth the fee?
Personally I think so -- I have been involved in multiple interims, and the
quality of the remote participation was (IMO) much better at the LIM. Having
someone else (Meetecho) handle the audio / video was great…
We (OpSec) were hoping to get more of the RIPE attendees (aka, operators) to
show up and participate, but:
A: there was a gap between RIPE and the LIM,
B: the existence of the LIM was not announced far enough in advance for most
RIPE attendees to change their plans
C: we (OpSec) did a poor job of announcing the fact that we would be meeting,
and asking for operators to come participate.
> Should we hold future
> LIMs, or do the scheduling and other issues mean that normal interims are the
> way forward?
Sorry, but figuring this sort of thing out is what we pay *you* for…
(aka, I don't know, to close to call).
W
>
> cheers,
> Adrian
>
>
--
What our ancestors would really be thinking, if they were alive today, is: "Why
is it so dark in here?"
-- (Terry Pratchett, Pyramids)
