Has anyone bothered to ask counsel for an opinion about the issues StJohns 
raised?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Brian E Carpenter
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 12:47 AM
> To: Doug Barton
> Cc: ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Just so I'm clear
> 
> On 24/10/2012 20:34, Doug Barton wrote:
> ...
> > ... Nothing in the text suggests an
> > unfettered right of creating new definitions of "vacant."
> 
> You mean, new compared to the first definition in Merriam-Webster.com?
> 
> 1: not occupied by an incumbent, possessor, or officer <a vacant office>
> <vacant thrones>
> 
> Objectively and factually, that seems to be the case. The IAOC is actually
> going an extra mile rather than simply informing NomCom that the seat has
> become vacant.
> 
>     Brian


Reply via email to