suppose = support (if you were an auto-correct program)

Grrrr...

On 11/4/12 5:59 PM, "Livingood, Jason" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>Same here. I'm noncom-eligible and suppose the recall.
>
>
>Jason Livingood
>
>On 11/4/12 11:45 AM, "Arturo Servin" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>      Thanks for the information to have a better decision.
>>
>>      I am Nomcom-eligible and you can add me to the signature list.
>>
>>
>>/Arturo Servin
>>
>>
>>On 04/11/2012 12:15, Bert Wijnen (IETF) wrote:
>>> Thanks for extra info.
>>> 
>>> You can add me to the list who sign the request for recall.
>>> 
>>> Bert
>>> 
>>>> --On Saturday, 03 November, 2012 11:36 -0400 Russ Housley
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> John:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> I assume at this point the IAOC would like to pursue the
>>>>>>> recall option?  If not, please be very clear about it to the
>>>>>>> list as I haven't actually seen a request from the IAOC for
>>>>>>> that process to proceed as far as I can tell.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Because I am personally very reluctant to see this handled by
>>>>>> recall, I want to ask a slightly different question:  Are the
>>>>>> people who met with Marshall convinced that he understood
>>>>>> that, if he did not resign, a recall was almost certain to be
>>>>>> initiated as our next step.  If the answer is "yes", he's made
>>>>>> his choice and I am ok with signing the petition.   If not, it
>>>>>> is possible that more discussion would be in order after the
>>>>>> petition process is complete.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I hope that, when Lynn accepts the petitions, another effort
>>>>>> (or several) will be made to et Marshall's attention -- it
>>>>>> presumably is not too late for him to resign until after the
>>>>>> relevant committee is appointed.
>>>>>
>>>>> At the end of our visit, I believe that Marshall understood
>>>>> that there were three possibilities:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) Tell the community that he intends to resume participation;
>>>>> 2) Resign;
>>>>> 3) Do nothing, which would very likely result in a recall.
>>>>>
>>>>> Russ
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>

Reply via email to