>This is what I have been talking about. The human mind's ability to believe >that the whole world sees everything the same way they do. It really is quite >amazing.
>These so-called gaps often arise because they were unstated assumptions or >things that the author believed were patently obvious and didn't need to be >stated. Actually didn't know needed to be stated. From his point of view, no >one would do it differently. Nothing had been left out and he didn't make the >"mistake." What the other guys did was a bug. That is why I think the IETF names the RFC or standards or specifications as *Request For Comments*, if there is a gap or the human mind failed, then it should communicate to the world and report such gap/bug. AB
