Fred,
I am not convinced that social nets (proprietary or not) are yet a good
tool to do IETF work. They are good to communicate one-way and some
informal two-ways, but that's all (at least for now)
What I had in mind was something very simple such that the IETF chair
could do is to automatically post to twitter, facebook, etc whenever
there is a new post from his blog and receive from communication using
those tools (besides the comments in the blog). But that is all.
About using an open social net approach I think there could be some
value but not sure if we are there yet, I will give it some thoughts
anyhow and how it could be done.
Regard,
as
On 25/02/2013 15:05, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
> Arturo, my suggestion: in some context, after discussion with the
> working-group-or-whatever-in-question, use one of the tools you mention to
> accomplish IETF work. Take careful notes of what proportion of the indicated
> community (if the IPv6 Operations WG, for example, the participants in v6ops)
> join the discussions, and what contribution those discussions make. Think
> about archives, focused issue discussion (what SMTP readers call "threads"),
> and so on. Then write a draft documenting the outcome of that.
