changed the subject ... and added a cc to some that might not follow ietf@ On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Eggert, Lars <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mar 3, 2013, at 13:37, Eric Burger <[email protected]> wrote: >> There are two other interpretations of this situation, neither of which I >> think is true, but we should consider the possibility. The first is the TSV >> is too narrow a field to support an area director and as such should be >> folded in with another area. The second is if all of the qualified people >> have moved on and no one is interested in building the expertise the IESG >> feels is lacking, then industry and academia have voted with their feet: the >> TSV is irrelevant and should be closed. >> >> Since I believe neither is the case, it sounds like the IESG requirements >> are too tight. > > I don't believe the requirements are too tight. *Someone* one the IESG needs > to understand congestion control. > > The likely possibility is that many qualified people failed to get sufficient > employer support to be able to volunteer. It's at least a 50% time > committment.
I'll ask a rather basic question and hope someone will answer in an educational way - Why is congestion control so important? And where does it apply? ... :-) -- Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE [email protected] | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | [email protected]
