No disagreement. It is merely *a* way, and, popping back to the original topic, it is better to allow the submission and deny the visibility than to disallow the submission
-=R On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 7:22 PM, David Morris <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2013, Roberto Peon wrote: > > > I think you mean backup solution, source control won't help on its own :) > > Source control, assuming the traditional server implementation, is one > form of backup solution ... but I agree, the requirement is a backup > solution where the backup is protected from the hazards the individual > computer would be subjected to. > > Draft submission is hardly the best way to protect work. > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > On 3/4/13 2:53 PM, Roberto Peon wrote: > > > > There was a fire in the office, three desks away from mine last > > > > week during the weekend. Sprinklers came on. If my computer had > > > > either caught fire, or been exposed to too much water (luckily > > > > neither happened) the draft would have been lost. > > > > > > Nothing is stopping you from using source control. :-) >
