On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Francis Galiegue <fgalie...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Christopher Morrow > <morrowc.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Francis Galiegue <fgalie...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Christopher Morrow >>> <morrowc.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> [...] >>> >>>> >>>> curious why rsync doesn't also seem 'straightforward' and 'well supported' >>>> ? >>>> >>> >>> * rsync doesn't prevent corruption of data, git does; >> >> rsync does do checksums... and are there really that many failures >> transfering 10k txt files? >> > > What I mean is that if there is disk corruption on the server hosting > the drafts (which can happen post write), rsync will happily send the > checksum of the corrupted draft. Git's mechanism makes such a > probability infinitesimal.
wait, so.. if the disk fails things go bad... I'm confused. > >>> * git show, git log, git bisect; >>> * git format-patch, git send-email etc. >>> >>> I second this proposal. >> >> I wasn't against it, just curious ... since rsync seems to do most of >> this (hook it to mail you changes each run...) >> > > It depends on what features you really want out of a "draft revision > control system", I suppose ;) > > -- > Francis Galiegue, fgalie...@gmail.com > JSON Schema in Java: http://json-schema-validator.herokuapp.com
