>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Narten <nar...@us.ibm.com> writes:
Thomas> The current cycle too often seems to be more like "new
Thomas> version posted". Wait if anyone reviews. Some reviews
Thomas> eventually, maybe. Oh, IETF meeting coming, time for a
Thomas> revision. But with meeting approaching, there are a zillion
Thomas> docs and cycles are limited. Rather haphazard, with too
Thomas> many documents effectively only being revised once per
Thomas> meeting cycle.I would like to suggest that the IESG Review be done in public on the WG mailing list. I've been a WG co-chair for just over a year now, and I'm truly astounded by what happens behind the scenes. It's not the substance, it's the quantity, and the lack of WG view of it. I think that this substantially and quite negatively contributes to the "fix it during IESG review", and therefore to the IESG workload. -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [ ] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
pgpI0t3me2_sq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
