On 5/11/13 10:17 , SM wrote:
At 18:36 10-05-2013, David Conrad wrote:
...
> Is it up to the IETF to set up a one-stop shop for personal data
requests?
I suspect not, but I suspect it isn't up to the IETF to dictate global
privacy policy either.
Section 2 is about the goals for distributing number resources (re.
first sentence). I suggest removing the third goal as it might be a
matter of global (or other) policy. It also makes privacy a non-issue
as there isn't any relationship between it and the goals.
...
The third goal you refer to focuses on the need for "accurate
registration information ... in order to meet a variety of operational
requirements." I believe this to be a valid technical concerns of the
IETF, it is difficult to imagine how a global Internet can technically
function without this. So, I think it is important for it to remain in
the draft.
However, issues of privacy, law enforcement access, and a myriad of
other extremely important issues related to the Internet Numbers
Registry System are outside the technical and operational scope of the
IETF. The whole point of the draft is to document the issues that are
properly the concern of the IETF towards the Internet Numbers Registry
System and to pass the rest of it to the multi-stakeholder environment
of ICANN and the RIRs to hash it out.
--
================================================
David Farmer Email: far...@umn.edu
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE Phone: 1-612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 1-612-812-9952
================================================
