On 5/14/2013 9:54 PM, Keith Moore wrote:
Publishing broken or unclear documents is not progress.
Keith
Broken, agreed.
Unclear, nope - please review the NON-DISCUSS criteria, notably:
The motivation for a particular feature of a protocol is not clear
enough. At the IESG review stage, protocols should not be blocked
because they provide capabilities beyond what seems necessary to acquit
their responsibilities.
The DISCUSS isn't there to make documents "better" - that's for
COMMENTs. A DISCUSS there to catch a set of problems and to *block* the
document's progress until that problem is resolved.
Joe
