On May 16, 2013, at 1:46 PM, Yoav Nir <y...@checkpoint.com> wrote: > There is a problem, though, that this will increase the load on ADs. Other > concerns raised during IETF LC may lead to revised I-Ds, which the ADs will > need to re-read (or at least look at the diff). I don't know how significant > this extra work would be, but it would come at a time that we're thinking of > ways to reduce AD workload. It might also require prolonging the LC time, > because there would be actual discussion in it.
If they raise the issue later in a "discuss", will they not have to do this anyway? How does this relate to the timing of the comment or the vehicle by which it is conveyed? ---------------------------------------------------- The ignorance of how to use new knowledge stockpiles exponentially. - Marshall McLuhan
