The first part of Section 2.1 should have a sentence added like "An RRTYPE code has been assigned so 48-bit MAC addresses can be stored using the DNS protocol." with an appropriate reference. A similar sentence for 64-bit MAC addresses should be added to the first part of Section 2.2.
The lists of Ethertypes in Appendix B should be brought up to date. Thanks, Donald ============================= Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA d3e...@gmail.com On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 7:07 AM, The IESG <iesg-secret...@ietf.org> wrote: > > The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider > the following document: > - 'IANA Considerations and IETF Protocol and Documentation Usage for IEEE > 802 Parameters' > <draft-eastlake-rfc5342bis-02.txt> as Best Current Practice > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2013-06-04. Exceptionally, comments may be > sent to i...@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the > beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > Abstract > > > Some IETF protocols make use of Ethernet frame formats and IEEE 802 > parameters. This document discusses some use of such parameters in > IETF protocols, specifies IANA considerations for assignment of > points under the IANA OUI (Organizationally Unique Identifier), > provides some values for use in documentation, and obsoletes RFC > 5342. > > > > > > The file can be obtained via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eastlake-rfc5342bis/ > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eastlake-rfc5342bis/ballot/ > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > >
