On Jun 10, 2013, at 8:31 PM, Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> wrote: > Which breaks some of the reasons why we do IETF last calls. WGs do get too > focused on a problem and do fail to do a balance response to problems.
If enough IETF last call people agree that the working group made a mistake, that could change the consensus evaluation, but there would have to be a substantive argument made. Revisiting the arguments that happened during WGLC in IETF last call with the same participants can't possibly change the consensus.
