On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Randy Bush <[email protected]> wrote: > > Re-formulating the LC text sounds like an excellent idea, to call for > > more substantive comments. > > perhaps we should go to the source of the problem and require a phd > dissertation and defense from draft authors. > > how much process chaos can we create? > > I think using a reductio ad absurdum is a little unfair when I've demonstrated that the proposed reformulation works (whilst being purely voluntary) in a similar organization with common participants.
In particular, I'm not suggesting any change to process. Dave.
