Cf. <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5513>
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 5:30 AM, t.p. <[email protected]> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 10:55 PM > Subject: Renaming RFC > > > > RFC should be renamed to Resulted From Comments. It's now the endpoint > of the process; Request For Comments dated from when it was the start. > > <tp> > > Fundamentally disagree. > > Some SDOs produce standards as tablets of stone, and the world at large > is not even allowed to read them. > > The IETF says this is the best we can do, can you help us make it > better, by making a request for comments. For me, this is the reason > why the IETF succeeds, because it looks to engage the whole world, to do > yet better. > > Tom Petch > > </tp> > > (Though RFCs through workgroups are arguably Resulted from > Collaboration/Consensus/Chairing). > > If you're going to alter the process in any way, start here. > > Lloyd Wood > http://sat-net.com/L.Wood/ > > > > >
