Re: [spfbis] Last Call: (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard

[John Levine]

>* The charter disallows major protocol changes -- removing the SPF RR type
>is a direct charter violation; since SPF is being used on the Internet. ...

Uh huh.

$ dig besserwisser.org txt

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;besserwisser.org.              IN      TXT

;; ANSWER SECTION:
besserwisser.org.       86173   IN      TXT     "MN-1334-RIPE"
besserwisser.org.       86173   IN      TXT     "v=spf0x44 be allowed to 
contaminate the DNS."
besserwisser.org.       86173   IN      TXT     "v=spf0x42 besides, SPF as 
concept is a layering violation."
besserwisser.org.       86173   IN      TXT     "v=spf0x41 not valid. because 
SPF records belong in RRtype 99."
besserwisser.org.       86173   IN      TXT     "v=spf0x43 adding insult to 
injury, this layering violation MUST not "

$ dig besserwisser.org spf

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;besserwisser.org.              IN      SPF

;; ANSWER SECTION:
besserwisser.org.       86140   IN      SPF     "v=spf1 ip6:0::/0 -all"
besserwisser.org.       86140   IN      SPF     "v=spf1 ip4:0.0.0.0/0 -all"

R's,
John