It also makes it obvious to everyone that Peter is using PGP. Which serves a pedagogical function, I guess. :)
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]>wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 9/9/13 11:02 AM, Cyrus Daboo wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > > > --On September 8, 2013 at 5:19:51 PM -0600 Peter Saint-Andre > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>> But until the MUAs across the board support it out of the box, > >>> I believe most people don't know about it or know what it > >>> means. > >> > >> So that's an opportunity to educate people. For instance, perhaps > >> the Internet Society might be interested in taking on that task. > > > > Is there a reason you choose to use "inline" signing with PGP > > rather than multipart/signed? Is that a technical reason (e.g., > > poor interoperability)? > > Ignorance or misconfiguration in my use of Thunderbird, it seems. > > Peter > > - -- > Peter Saint-Andre > https://stpeter.im/ > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) > Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSLgF/AAoJEOoGpJErxa2pnG8P/RpJj1SDr1plL3myoumgi4iS > 0RLDNqq+2J+aiuDOccVJZYRITWFo3HmP3XD+nuDXiVxVUl+vuDhWHhWzQxtV04DS > AUTN5mgY7Z5z2wfECFzC2MmqEG9tVD7i/gTij8cHTHyFuMvF27X32nTe/gxpo0eu > 5cOhbzt2YWyF0nZff8cbQ+7o6d8RtaqE6G+jJVS4qUWeqEhYoFjjIGWieHZaNmw2 > U/CQfYnAbpph/D38QDP/Tw8UJkNLXlukrbKPKtd+8Z/KAxGYkldabD01Frdkt5ZF > k2PosNHHpy9Ob61SH8N/vrAO/NF4c6VYEoAk8yqCgYLLNH3BSc3fSUoGjF47VU8f > PMKW/Hz9cG/1P5VhVTHNPx50b5Auuglo36pLIvlJjYzT8cZCpaCElhn4dScKLMLt > //E+/EdTs6gnayBgbok31NXPWr4ORMlaff8jSinVK08COIGyCyul+9vo2/vs4WdI > XZ8ToqmXUg/0d0KfRozqCQwKDHHqdkYIfTt8/rLDheXUDTTuvKWxmmLLxXs6CXMU > kMQ99IaRraoAVWaEiUhIdLH3Ewj7ibFsqx9UruvUX5irqDO9SbjlJC7b41iHgUIG > HBJiH3w947+mHLIXFJ2G9dBcv+CuOYVATqScu0jSDbsWE6xsqS1miNofyr1+al49 > wcogO/B8kXm7cSHJjce5 > =cGPH > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
