> we need to keep the flexibility of bringing in someone new agree
> But my main issue is that the draft sounds like its trying to take over and > redefine an ISOC program, which I don't think the IETF can or should do. The > ISOC program has a purpose, a history and at least from my perspective is > working pretty well with the budget it has available. I'm not sure we can > actually improve it much. agree, of course. at best we can provide input. but it really is an ISOC program. Jari
