On Thursday 15 February 2007 01:31, Ruwan Wijesundera wrote: > We have used Athena and Artemis software to analyses the EXAFS. When we do > the analysis, we used different S2o for each path for fitting of Cu2O data. > I succeeded to obtain good fitting by this way. Documents related to > percent EXAFS analysis have been mentioned S2o is one value for all paths. > What I want to know is our fittings are correct or not. I am looking > forward early response.
> About 10 years ago we had being using another program made by Tokyo > University in Japan. In this program, the refined parameters also included > S2oj and Nj to the each cells Questions 8 and 9 on this FAQ page: http://cars9.uchicago.edu/iffwiki/FAQ/FeffitModeling are, I think, relevant to your question. In particular, read the first link under question 9, keeping in mind that it was written 3 and 1/2 years ago and Artemis has changed somewhat since then. B -- Bruce Ravel ---------------------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Molecular Environmental Science Group, Building 203, Room E-165 MRCAT, Sector 10, Advanced Photon Source, Building 433, Room B007 Argonne National Laboratory phone and voice mail: (1) 630 252 5033 Argonne IL 60439, USA fax: (1) 630 252 9793 My homepage: http://cars9.uchicago.edu/~ravel EXAFS software: http://cars9.uchicago.edu/~ravel/software/exafs/ _______________________________________________ Ifeffit mailing list Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit